November 2025 - Participate - Witness-network mailing lists

Re: Request to add witness witness.stagemole.eu
by Rasmus Dahlberg 05 Nov '25

05 Nov '25

On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 08:27:39AM +0100, Grégoire Détrez wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2025 at 15:21, Rasmus Dahlberg <rgdd(a)glasklarteknik.se> wrote: > > > $ echo "witness.stagemole.eu+67f7aea0+BEqSG3yu9YrmcM3BHvQYTxwFj3uSWakQepafafpUqklv" > > | sigsum-key from-vkey -v > > Key name "witness.stagemole.eu", key type: 0x04 (cosignature/v1) > > ssh-ed25519 > > AAAAC3NzaC1lZDI1NTE5AAAAIEqSG3yu9YrmcM3BHvQYTxwFj3uSWakQepafafpUqklv sigsum > > key > > > > Looks well-formed and with the right type! > > > > 🎉 🎉 🎉 > > > > Starting with the testing list sounds good (staging is not open yet). > > > > I was wondering about this: does it mean we'll need to pull both the test > list and the (selected) staging list in the future? Good question -- the test list is intentionally a bit YOLO so I'd say it's ok that you stop configuring it and instead switch to staging later. If anyone has a different take I'd be curious to hear it! > > I'm intending to add > > > > | Mullvad VPN AB | [testing/log-list.1][] | < > > https://witness.stagemole.eu/about> | > > > > to the testing witness table here: > > > > https://witness-network.org/witness-tables/ > > > > Just waiting for the about page to be ready -- so let me know when it is! > > > > Ready now ☑️ Just queued you up in the testing table -- you can see the status here: https://github.com/transparency-dev/witness-network/pull/18 > > > > Yep, correct. And I'd say a likely way this turns out is if we, e.g., > > have a > > 1qps list then the 10qps is probably having the 1qps list as a subset. So > > basically, as a witness operator you'd select the highest profile your > > able to > > accomodate, and we as maintainers will do our best to direct logs to the > > different lists without hogging all the capacity. So for example, we would > > definitely not put a 1qps log on the 1qps list, since then it's full. :-) > > > Thanks, that does make it clearer! (Sounds like a fun allocation > problem 🤓) Fantastic, thanks for asking the questions! -Rasmus > > Grégoire

1 0

Request to add witness witness.stagemole.eu
by Gregoire Detrez 04 Nov '25

04 Nov '25

Hello again! We would also like to add our staging witness to the witness network: - operator name: Mullvad VPN AB - vkey: witness.stagemole.eu +ac5cc086+BEqSG3yu9YrmcM3BHvQYTxwFj3uSWakQepafafpUqklv - log list: testing and/or staging (?) - about page: https://witness.stagemole.eu/about I don't really understand the part about a performance profile: is there a list of options I can pick from? Does this determine what logs I get from the witness network? Cheers, Grégoire

2 3

Requests to add log serviceberry.tlog.stagemole.eu
by Gregoire Detrez 03 Nov '25

03 Nov '25

Hello, We'd like to participate to the Witness Network by adding our staging Sigsum log: - origin-line: sigsum.org/v1/tree/1643169b32bef33a3f54f8a353b87c475d19b6223cbb106390d10a29… - vkey: sigsum.org/v1/tree/1643169b32bef33a3f54f8a353b87c475d19b6223cbb106390d10a29… - add-checkpoint rate: every 10s - contact: services(a)mullvad.net, https://serviceberry.tlog.stagemole.eu/about I'm not sure what list is appropriate at this point. Going by the descriptions on the witness-network website, our intention is to run this more as a staging log (long-term but experimental), but I think the test list would work as well. (There doesn't seem to be any witness in the staging table so maybe it's too soon to add logs to the staging list?) Cheers, Grégoire

2 1

2025

Participate November 2025 ----- 2025 ----- November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025

Participate November 2025