Participate December 2025

participate@lists.witness-network.org

1 participants
2 discussions

Re: Request to add witness witness.stagemole.eu
by Rasmus Dahlberg 27 Feb '26

27 Feb '26

On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 08:27:39AM +0100, Grégoire Détrez wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2025 at 15:21, Rasmus Dahlberg <rgdd(a)glasklarteknik.se> wrote: > > > $ echo "witness.stagemole.eu+67f7aea0+BEqSG3yu9YrmcM3BHvQYTxwFj3uSWakQepafafpUqklv" > > | sigsum-key from-vkey -v > > Key name "witness.stagemole.eu", key type: 0x04 (cosignature/v1) > > ssh-ed25519 > > AAAAC3NzaC1lZDI1NTE5AAAAIEqSG3yu9YrmcM3BHvQYTxwFj3uSWakQepafafpUqklv sigsum > > key > > > > Looks well-formed and with the right type! > > > > 🎉 🎉 🎉 > > > > Starting with the testing list sounds good (staging is not open yet). > > > > I was wondering about this: does it mean we'll need to pull both the test > list and the (selected) staging list in the future? Good question -- the test list is intentionally a bit YOLO so I'd say it's ok that you stop configuring it and instead switch to staging later. If anyone has a different take I'd be curious to hear it! > > I'm intending to add > > > > | Mullvad VPN AB | [testing/log-list.1][] | < > > https://witness.stagemole.eu/about> | > > > > to the testing witness table here: > > > > https://witness-network.org/witness-tables/ > > > > Just waiting for the about page to be ready -- so let me know when it is! > > > > Ready now ☑️ Just queued you up in the testing table -- you can see the status here: https://github.com/transparency-dev/witness-network/pull/18 > > > > Yep, correct. And I'd say a likely way this turns out is if we, e.g., > > have a > > 1qps list then the 10qps is probably having the 1qps list as a subset. So > > basically, as a witness operator you'd select the highest profile your > > able to > > accomodate, and we as maintainers will do our best to direct logs to the > > different lists without hogging all the capacity. So for example, we would > > definitely not put a 1qps log on the 1qps list, since then it's full. :-) > > > Thanks, that does make it clearer! (Sounds like a fun allocation > problem 🤓) Fantastic, thanks for asking the questions! -Rasmus > > Grégoire

1 1

New staging witness: witness.navigli.sunlight.geomys.org
by Filippo Valsorda 01 Dec '25

01 Dec '25

Hello folks, I am happy to introduce the witness.navigli.sunlight.geomys.org staging witness. It replaces the experimental navigli.sunlight.geomys.org/dev testing witness. It is operated by Geomys, and it configures all the staging and testing lists. The about page is https://geomys.org/witness/navigli. Cheers, Filippo P.S. In order to have something meaningful to point uptime monitoring at, I built a little service that submits a checkpoint to a witness and returns 200 OK only if the returned signature is fresh and valid. You are welcome to use it to monitor your own witnesses. https://ct-uptime-alerts.fly.dev/witness/

2 1

2026

2025

Participate December 2025 ----- 2026 ----- May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 ----- 2025 ----- December 2025 November 2025 October 2025

Participate December 2025