Hi Tony, I subscribed to the list after your post so this is not threaded to it. Not a maintainer, so take the first half as a reader of the same archive rather than an answer. On process, the intake reads as plumbing rather than scale. Origin line, key format, a declared rate budget, a contact that answers. Rasmus Dahlberg has replied to nearly every thread on that list since October, and the testing tier says expect breakage, so the bar looks like sincerity. Two of the recent requests have no reply at all, which is worth knowing before you read silence as a no. On substance, the thing I would nail before submitting. A log of allowed and stopped actions carries a claim the log cannot recompute, which is who authorised the allow. Inclusion and consistency a verifier recomputes from your bytes with no issuer in the path. The authorisation is attested by whoever ran it. Worth saying which of your claims rests on which, because independent witnessing fixes the first and leaves the second where it was. Blake